creenceapetle
New Member
Search Engine Journal recently wrote an article quoting pieces of a debate that's sprung up about digg (and more generically, the social bookmarking sites) being included in google's index.Here are the arguments:Allen Stern:Quote:My belief is that this is not enough to warrant a listing in Google. Since at its most basic sense Digg only offers a link to the actual story, then that story should occupy that position within Google, not the Digg link. I believe content publishers actually lose the chance to see that visitor because the person has to click twice and even understand that they must do that. And I am talking about mainstream non-diggers now, not the group who already understands what Digg is for. William Burn:Quote
igg.com is acting as a gateway to the great content which would (usually) have been lost in Google
igg.com is acting as a gateway to the great content which would (usually) have been lost in Google