<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://microsoft.com">http://microsoft.com</a><!-- m -->
and then read this: <!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.stopdesign.com/log/2004/08/25/microsoft-advances.html">http://www.stopdesign.com/log/2004/08/2 ... ances.html</a><!-- m -->
HAH! Take that...you table-layout users!
*Applaudes Microsoft--I have much respect for your decision to move towards CSS**Applauds, btw
But the layout is still tabular. That's all that's tabular, but it's not CSS. It's hybrid, which is a step up, but still...For a laugh, take a look at the validation results for that page:
* <!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1&uri=http%3A//www.microsoft.com/">http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1 ... osoft.com/</a><!-- m -->
* <!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?profile=css2&warning=2&uri=http%3A//www.microsoft.com/">http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/vali ... osoft.com/</a><!-- m -->
What a bunch of Bozos.I wouldn't use bozo, but how I describe Microsoft might not be too appropriate for these forums...49 errors with HTML 4.01 transitional, eh? 66 with HTML 4.01 strict, and a whopping 180 with XHTML 1.1
Originally posted by Charles
For a laugh, take a look at the validation results for that page
Heh, it was a good laugh.
Originally posted by Charles
What a bunch of Bozos.
Though not the exact word I'd use, it fits nonetheless.Originally posted by Paul Jr
Heh, it was a good laugh. O_O And I thought I was easily amused...
and then read this: <!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.stopdesign.com/log/2004/08/25/microsoft-advances.html">http://www.stopdesign.com/log/2004/08/2 ... ances.html</a><!-- m -->
HAH! Take that...you table-layout users!
*Applaudes Microsoft--I have much respect for your decision to move towards CSS**Applauds, btw
But the layout is still tabular. That's all that's tabular, but it's not CSS. It's hybrid, which is a step up, but still...For a laugh, take a look at the validation results for that page:
* <!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1&uri=http%3A//www.microsoft.com/">http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1 ... osoft.com/</a><!-- m -->
* <!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?profile=css2&warning=2&uri=http%3A//www.microsoft.com/">http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/vali ... osoft.com/</a><!-- m -->
What a bunch of Bozos.I wouldn't use bozo, but how I describe Microsoft might not be too appropriate for these forums...49 errors with HTML 4.01 transitional, eh? 66 with HTML 4.01 strict, and a whopping 180 with XHTML 1.1
Originally posted by Charles
For a laugh, take a look at the validation results for that page
Heh, it was a good laugh.
Originally posted by Charles
What a bunch of Bozos.
Though not the exact word I'd use, it fits nonetheless.Originally posted by Paul Jr
Heh, it was a good laugh.
O_O And I thought I was easily amused...