Recently I found this search queryhttp://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=& ... klfkdjdkfjWhat does this do as opposed to the previous 7 exclusion paramters? And why do I rank #1 for almost every keyword I target, what in these results are being not-filterd?Well first of all, Google is not going to read anything past 10 words in the search box.I didnt realize that, thanks it makes sense. So is this just another indication of a non sandboxed result; or is this showing results with all the filters off?Thanks for all the help in all my stupid threads vetofunkhm, I still don't get why this changes the serps though.. I'm on page 2 if I search for my keyword than all that crap with it, but page 6 if I don't.I dont get it either. It seems using these exclusion parameters shows us what our sites really are without any filters being applied, so I guess the sites that change alot when these nonsense terms are added means that we are tripping one or more filters.It's really interesting, because with those added nonsense commands I rank top for almost every keyword I have, but without them I'm doing about average.So do you think it's because of an over-optimization of anchor text, or perhaps too many keywords on the page, or a combination of everything...I wonder if there's some way to test it.What's the recommended optimization for post Florida update so that the filters are not triggered?I don't think there's any sandbox filter in play here. I have a site that has been around for years. Ranks #4 with out all the exclusion parameters but #1 with them.....the results with -dfhgjk etc...are very similar to post florida....the sandbox issues have only been recent and based on what I have read are affecting new sites and site that have been penalized. Although I agree that the exclusion parameter is overriding the snadbox effect since I see new sites in there that are not yet part of the normal results.That is a rather odd query! LMAO....
Unfiltered Results
- Thread starter dinges
- Start date