Rather than buy a book, I was wondering if there are any decent websites that I could learn more about CSS.You might consider checking this post (<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://forums.webdeveloper.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=24366#post126749">http://forums.webdeveloper.com/showthre ... post126749</a><!-- m -->) in which contains a decent list I put together of recommended sites.One of the links in Fred's list is Netscape's DevEdge. If you have Mozilla/Firebird, which I consider an indispensible developer's tool, you can load the DevEdge sidebar into it and have a huge amount of HTML, CSS and Javascript info at your fingertips.Firebird? Firefox.Originally posted by omega
Firebird? Firefox.
I still use Firebird...Neva used it. I have FF tho.....From <!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.mozilla.org/products/firefox/">http://www.mozilla.org/products/firefox/</a><!-- m -->
Firefox is a Technology Preview.
That's why I still use Firebird.in context:
From <!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.mozilla.org/products/firefox/">http://www.mozilla.org/products/firefox/</a><!-- m -->
Firefox is a Technology Preview
While this software may work well enough to be relied upon as your primary browser, we make no guarantees of its performance or stability in its pre-1.0 state and it should not be relied upon for mission-critical tasks
So, While Firefox .8 isn't a stable 1.0 release, it is still more stable than Firebird .7. To my knowledge at least...Originally posted by omega
Firebird? Firefox. YepOriginally posted by Paul Jr quote:From <!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.mozilla.org/products/firefox/">http://www.mozilla.org/products/firefox/</a><!-- m -->
Firefox is a Technology Preview.
That's why I still use Firebird. Generally speaking a .8 technology preview is more stable than a .7 technology preview. I've moved my default browsing and mail to FB/TB but I can't say they're really any improvement over the Big Mo bundle.As a FB 0.7/FF 0.8 user, I've never had much of an issue with stablilty. Just because the name changed doesn't make it less stable.And, of course the CORE of both of them is the very stable Moz 1.5/1.6 browser so they're at least as stable as that.
Firebird? Firefox.
I still use Firebird...Neva used it. I have FF tho.....From <!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.mozilla.org/products/firefox/">http://www.mozilla.org/products/firefox/</a><!-- m -->
Firefox is a Technology Preview.
That's why I still use Firebird.in context:
From <!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.mozilla.org/products/firefox/">http://www.mozilla.org/products/firefox/</a><!-- m -->
Firefox is a Technology Preview
While this software may work well enough to be relied upon as your primary browser, we make no guarantees of its performance or stability in its pre-1.0 state and it should not be relied upon for mission-critical tasks
So, While Firefox .8 isn't a stable 1.0 release, it is still more stable than Firebird .7. To my knowledge at least...Originally posted by omega
Firebird? Firefox. YepOriginally posted by Paul Jr quote:From <!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.mozilla.org/products/firefox/">http://www.mozilla.org/products/firefox/</a><!-- m -->
Firefox is a Technology Preview.
That's why I still use Firebird. Generally speaking a .8 technology preview is more stable than a .7 technology preview. I've moved my default browsing and mail to FB/TB but I can't say they're really any improvement over the Big Mo bundle.As a FB 0.7/FF 0.8 user, I've never had much of an issue with stablilty. Just because the name changed doesn't make it less stable.And, of course the CORE of both of them is the very stable Moz 1.5/1.6 browser so they're at least as stable as that.