Is there an auto-refresh script that I can use so that my Netscape using visitors can see the changes to my site? I'm having problems with people using forms that are no longer open on my site. For some reason Netscape doesn't refresh a page, instead it shows it as it was the last time you went to the page. This is becoming a huge problem.<!--content-->Hmmmm... what version of netscape does this happen on?! I've never heard of this problem before?!<!--content-->I have the latest version of Netscape, which I use to cross browser check my site and it does pull up the site as it looked the last time I used it.<!--content-->hmmmm... interesting... I use N7 and never had that problem. 
<br />
<br />
Wouldn't this be a problem on the user-end though with their cookies and stuff?!<!--content-->Here's an example:<br />
<br />
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://geocities.com/a79webdesign/screenshots334">http://geocities.com/a79webdesign/screenshots334</a><!-- m --><br />
<br />
Even if it is a problem with a user's cookies, it still doesn't help my site any.<!--content-->weird. does sound like a caching issue or something.<br />
<br />
maybe try:<br />
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Pragma" CONTENT="no-cache"><br />
<META HTTP-EQUIV="expires" CONTENT="-1"><br />
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Cache-Control" CONTENT="no-cache"><!--content-->Thanks Transmothra! I didn't think about META Tags.<!--content-->Originally posted by a79webdesign <br />
Thanks Transmothra! I didn't think about META Tags. nobody ever does.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
poor metas.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
poor, poor metas.<br />
<br />
<br />
</Eeyore><!--content-->This does sound like its dependent on the end-user. Of course a majority of people will leave the settings alone, but some (including myself) set them as they see fit. So, I think the meta tag might work.<br />
<br />
ultimately is would depend on the end-user's settings though. :splat:<br />
<br />
Does anyone else think that they are starting to cram too much info into the meta tags? :shady:<!--content-->actually, metas are becoming more and more useful. these days, when i go to a cool site, and i'm browsing on Mozilla, i get a special menu (view >> show/hide >> site navigation bar) that automatically gives me all kinds of instant access to whatever the thoughtful and ingenius programmer thinks of to put in there.<br />
<br />
here's an example from my own phpBB2 board (& i didn't even know it was in there!)<br />
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.meat-thing.com/bbs/">http://www.meat-thing.com/bbs/</a><!-- m --><br />
<br />
the meta tags look like this. i find them incredibly useful... and also a little like easter eggs!<br />
<br />
<link rel="top" href=http://www.htmlforums.com/archive/index.php/"index.php" title="" /><br />
<link rel="search" href=http://www.htmlforums.com/archive/index.php/"search.php" title="" /><br />
<link rel="help" href=http://www.htmlforums.com/archive/index.php/"faq.php" title="" /><br />
<link rel="author" href=http://www.htmlforums.com/archive/index.php/"memberlist.php" title="" /><!--content-->
<br /><br />
Wouldn't this be a problem on the user-end though with their cookies and stuff?!<!--content-->Here's an example:<br />
<br />
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://geocities.com/a79webdesign/screenshots334">http://geocities.com/a79webdesign/screenshots334</a><!-- m --><br />
<br />
Even if it is a problem with a user's cookies, it still doesn't help my site any.<!--content-->weird. does sound like a caching issue or something.<br />
<br />
maybe try:<br />
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Pragma" CONTENT="no-cache"><br />
<META HTTP-EQUIV="expires" CONTENT="-1"><br />
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Cache-Control" CONTENT="no-cache"><!--content-->Thanks Transmothra! I didn't think about META Tags.<!--content-->Originally posted by a79webdesign <br />
Thanks Transmothra! I didn't think about META Tags. nobody ever does.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
poor metas.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
poor, poor metas.<br />
<br />
<br />
</Eeyore><!--content-->This does sound like its dependent on the end-user. Of course a majority of people will leave the settings alone, but some (including myself) set them as they see fit. So, I think the meta tag might work.<br />
<br />
ultimately is would depend on the end-user's settings though. :splat:<br />
<br />
Does anyone else think that they are starting to cram too much info into the meta tags? :shady:<!--content-->actually, metas are becoming more and more useful. these days, when i go to a cool site, and i'm browsing on Mozilla, i get a special menu (view >> show/hide >> site navigation bar) that automatically gives me all kinds of instant access to whatever the thoughtful and ingenius programmer thinks of to put in there.<br />
<br />
here's an example from my own phpBB2 board (& i didn't even know it was in there!)<br />
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.meat-thing.com/bbs/">http://www.meat-thing.com/bbs/</a><!-- m --><br />
<br />
the meta tags look like this. i find them incredibly useful... and also a little like easter eggs!<br />
<br />
<link rel="top" href=http://www.htmlforums.com/archive/index.php/"index.php" title="" /><br />
<link rel="search" href=http://www.htmlforums.com/archive/index.php/"search.php" title="" /><br />
<link rel="help" href=http://www.htmlforums.com/archive/index.php/"faq.php" title="" /><br />
<link rel="author" href=http://www.htmlforums.com/archive/index.php/"memberlist.php" title="" /><!--content-->