I really like the movie references in this blog post. For all the SEO guru's out there, your comments about this blog post is more then welcomed. Just to let you'll know, this is not a boring blog post. It's got a little old school flavor in it.
Stoney deGeyter wrote this. Quote: Remember the movie Old School with Vince Vaughn and Will Farrell? Yeah, me neither. That's because, while I'm sure the movie has some funny scenes, it just didn't have the staying power of, say... Tommy Boy. Of course Tommy Boy had a very distinct advantage out of the gate... it didn't star Will Farrell. You really can't come back from that kind of thing.
In the SEO world there is "old school" and then there is "old school SEO nonsense". In case you haven't figured it out, in my world, the "old school SEO nonsense" stars Will Farrell. In your world, it might star Colin Farrell, Lindsay Lohan, or the entire cast of Big Bang Theory--all viable alternatives.
Like the actors noted above, "old school SEO nonsense" gets a lot of buzz, but underneath the surface, there just isn't anything there. People are drawn to it like a mosquito to a bug light because it feels safe. It looks easy. It's simplicity wrapped in a complexity. But, in the end, it's... Continued at: It Isn't "Old School SEO" If It's Just Nonsense SEO
Does anyone have any comments on the information talked about in this blog post? Not to long ago, i read a lot of threads on V7N and another forum about keyword density and using keywords..etc (Almost every answer was different in some sort of way
) I don't know who to believe and just do what i think is right in using keywords on my site. lol
Do you disagree with anything in this blog post? If so, please explain why? Quote: Does anyone have any comments on the information talked about in this blog post? Yes. He compared the cast of Big Bang Theory (PBUT) to Will Farrell? That infidel must die. Snakeair, there is not much heat to discuss on that article. The writer is boring right about senseless 7% keyword density rule. It was artificial and it stays artificial. The really working methods were there 10 years ago and are staying valid also now.
A keywords-related example of such methods: put the keywords in the title with some variations, put them in the description and in the H1, H2 tags, use them in the content in a such a way that it will be a joy for your reader to read the text (avoid keyword spamming in all those places). And do not concern on this idiotic keyword density rule.
Stoney deGeyter wrote this. Quote: Remember the movie Old School with Vince Vaughn and Will Farrell? Yeah, me neither. That's because, while I'm sure the movie has some funny scenes, it just didn't have the staying power of, say... Tommy Boy. Of course Tommy Boy had a very distinct advantage out of the gate... it didn't star Will Farrell. You really can't come back from that kind of thing.
In the SEO world there is "old school" and then there is "old school SEO nonsense". In case you haven't figured it out, in my world, the "old school SEO nonsense" stars Will Farrell. In your world, it might star Colin Farrell, Lindsay Lohan, or the entire cast of Big Bang Theory--all viable alternatives.
Like the actors noted above, "old school SEO nonsense" gets a lot of buzz, but underneath the surface, there just isn't anything there. People are drawn to it like a mosquito to a bug light because it feels safe. It looks easy. It's simplicity wrapped in a complexity. But, in the end, it's... Continued at: It Isn't "Old School SEO" If It's Just Nonsense SEO
Does anyone have any comments on the information talked about in this blog post? Not to long ago, i read a lot of threads on V7N and another forum about keyword density and using keywords..etc (Almost every answer was different in some sort of way
Do you disagree with anything in this blog post? If so, please explain why? Quote: Does anyone have any comments on the information talked about in this blog post? Yes. He compared the cast of Big Bang Theory (PBUT) to Will Farrell? That infidel must die. Snakeair, there is not much heat to discuss on that article. The writer is boring right about senseless 7% keyword density rule. It was artificial and it stays artificial. The really working methods were there 10 years ago and are staying valid also now.
A keywords-related example of such methods: put the keywords in the title with some variations, put them in the description and in the H1, H2 tags, use them in the content in a such a way that it will be a joy for your reader to read the text (avoid keyword spamming in all those places). And do not concern on this idiotic keyword density rule.