<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.ubbedall.dk/v9/">http://www.ubbedall.dk/v9/</a><!-- m --><br /><br />thats immense, no flash <img src="http://www.webdesignerforum.co.uk/style_emoticons/default/clapping.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":clapping:" border="0" alt="clapping.gif" /> <br /><br />hows it done?<!--content-->
It's done with javascript - if you disable javascript and click on the links nothing happens - which isn't good.<br /><br />I don't write javascript so can't go into technical terms, but it's all doen with coordinates I think. So each link knows to move the page at a certain speed to a specifi destination.<!--content-->
Oooh, that is too cool! Something with JS, that's about as far as I can go towards explaining it.<!--content-->
wow that site is pretty kool. <br /><br />thats nice stuff.<!--content-->
is it ajax possibly, like mootools?<!--content-->
I think he did it with mootools yes.<br /><br />Wildo<!--content-->
Its not ajax, just Mootools javascript animation. Its pretty easy to do<!--content-->
Pitty it doens't work without JS. it wouldn't be hard. just have it scroll downwards and each link would be page anchors. then if the users had JS it'd trigger the special layout.<!--content-->
I agree, not very accessible is it? There's a fine line between concept / design and W3C compliance, some still opt for the non compliant in an attempt to seem flash. Excuse the unintended pun.<!--content-->
Looks nice with JavaScript but as others have said, it wouldn't have been hard to make the links work without JavaScript.<br /><br />It also doesn't work without CSS so as impressive as it initially seems, it could certainly do with some improvements.<!--content-->
very nice.<br /><br />each div will have a "goto" position, in pixels. This may have been worked out before, or on the fly... it may even be done by multiplying the item index by the box width.<br /><br />This goto position is then animated to from the current position, and the speeds are tweened, to give the acceleration and deceleration effects.<br /><br />It would be moderately easy to code, and yes it does look ****ing cool.<!--content-->
<!--quoteo(post=6010:date=Jun 10 2007, 12:34 AM:name=Thomas Thomassen)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Thomas Thomassen @ Jun 10 2007, 12:34 AM) [snapback]6010[/snapback]</div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->Pitty it doens't work without JS. it wouldn't be hard. just have it scroll downwards and each link would be page anchors. then if the users had JS it'd trigger the special layout.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd--><br /><br />Not sure i agree - I tried to do a horizonatlly scrolled sight using anchors and couldn't get them to jump to the correct place horizontally. If the motion was up and down that would work, but as it's left and right it won't - unless you know otherwise - if so can you let me know as I like to achieve that kind of affect with anchors and no javascript.<br /><!--content-->
crazy idea here, but could you use the cascading menu using list items, to contain the page details, instead of a submenu<br /><br />admittedly this would be onhover rather than onclick, but it could work...<!--content-->
It's done with javascript - if you disable javascript and click on the links nothing happens - which isn't good.<br /><br />I don't write javascript so can't go into technical terms, but it's all doen with coordinates I think. So each link knows to move the page at a certain speed to a specifi destination.<!--content-->
Oooh, that is too cool! Something with JS, that's about as far as I can go towards explaining it.<!--content-->
wow that site is pretty kool. <br /><br />thats nice stuff.<!--content-->
is it ajax possibly, like mootools?<!--content-->
I think he did it with mootools yes.<br /><br />Wildo<!--content-->
Its not ajax, just Mootools javascript animation. Its pretty easy to do<!--content-->
Pitty it doens't work without JS. it wouldn't be hard. just have it scroll downwards and each link would be page anchors. then if the users had JS it'd trigger the special layout.<!--content-->
I agree, not very accessible is it? There's a fine line between concept / design and W3C compliance, some still opt for the non compliant in an attempt to seem flash. Excuse the unintended pun.<!--content-->
Looks nice with JavaScript but as others have said, it wouldn't have been hard to make the links work without JavaScript.<br /><br />It also doesn't work without CSS so as impressive as it initially seems, it could certainly do with some improvements.<!--content-->
very nice.<br /><br />each div will have a "goto" position, in pixels. This may have been worked out before, or on the fly... it may even be done by multiplying the item index by the box width.<br /><br />This goto position is then animated to from the current position, and the speeds are tweened, to give the acceleration and deceleration effects.<br /><br />It would be moderately easy to code, and yes it does look ****ing cool.<!--content-->
<!--quoteo(post=6010:date=Jun 10 2007, 12:34 AM:name=Thomas Thomassen)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Thomas Thomassen @ Jun 10 2007, 12:34 AM) [snapback]6010[/snapback]</div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->Pitty it doens't work without JS. it wouldn't be hard. just have it scroll downwards and each link would be page anchors. then if the users had JS it'd trigger the special layout.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd--><br /><br />Not sure i agree - I tried to do a horizonatlly scrolled sight using anchors and couldn't get them to jump to the correct place horizontally. If the motion was up and down that would work, but as it's left and right it won't - unless you know otherwise - if so can you let me know as I like to achieve that kind of affect with anchors and no javascript.<br /><!--content-->
crazy idea here, but could you use the cascading menu using list items, to contain the page details, instead of a submenu<br /><br />admittedly this would be onhover rather than onclick, but it could work...<!--content-->