<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.subsilvernet.com/leftbar">http://www.subsilvernet.com/leftbar</a><!-- m --><br />
Thats is my websitepage i need validated. I have it(at least the first...I'm working on it!) at HTML 4.01 Transistional valid, but im going for XHTML 1.1 I was wondering if anyone had an idea or maybe if I was lucky would do it for me. Ill add your name in at the botton and a link to your website if you want.<!--content-->Okay, I'll help you
<br />
<br />
End all your tags. For example <meta name="somename" content="somecontent"> is <meta name="somename" content="somecontent" />. All tags <br />, <img />, <link /> must be closed.<br />
<br />
All tags must be in lowercase. However, your non-predefined values don't count. So <a href=http://www.webdeveloper.com/forum/archive/index.php/"http://www.SoMePaGe.Com">text</a> is valid, but <A hReF="http://www.somepage.com">text</A> is not valid.<br />
<br />
Markup must be well formed, <b><i><u>text</b></i></u> is invalid. <b><i><u>text</u></i></b>, however is valid. <br />
<br />
Deprecated elements should be eliminated. <font>, and target are some examples.<br />
<br />
Tables shouldn't be used for layout- CSS is much easier, efficient, and accesible (if done right).<br />
<br />
Well, those are some starting pointers. Once you get these taken into account, valid pages wil be that much more within your grasp<br />
<br />
Make the changes according to what I've listed, and I bet you the vast majority of those errors will be gone.<!--content-->or maybe if I was lucky would do it for me. its not hard....
why would you want someone 2 do it 4 u?<!--content-->He's right, it isn't hard. It's actually easy... and you probably already know this, but i'd check <!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.subsilvernet.com%2F&charset=%28detect+automatically%29&doctype=XHTML+1.1&verbose=1">http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http% ... &verbose=1</a><!-- m --> for more specific instruction...<!--content-->yea!my sites valid....thanks...sorta?!<!--content-->Yeah, it is valid. That URL was to a validator page with a document ovverride in place, so it was saying "if it was XHTML 1.1, it'd be valid. So go to <!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.subsilvernet.com%2F&charset=%28detect+automatically%29&doctype=%28detect+automatically%29&verbose=1">http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http% ... &verbose=1</a><!-- m --> and you'll see it's valid See? 'Twas easy 
<!--content-->
Thats is my websitepage i need validated. I have it(at least the first...I'm working on it!) at HTML 4.01 Transistional valid, but im going for XHTML 1.1 I was wondering if anyone had an idea or maybe if I was lucky would do it for me. Ill add your name in at the botton and a link to your website if you want.<!--content-->Okay, I'll help you
<br /><br />
End all your tags. For example <meta name="somename" content="somecontent"> is <meta name="somename" content="somecontent" />. All tags <br />, <img />, <link /> must be closed.<br />
<br />
All tags must be in lowercase. However, your non-predefined values don't count. So <a href=http://www.webdeveloper.com/forum/archive/index.php/"http://www.SoMePaGe.Com">text</a> is valid, but <A hReF="http://www.somepage.com">text</A> is not valid.<br />
<br />
Markup must be well formed, <b><i><u>text</b></i></u> is invalid. <b><i><u>text</u></i></b>, however is valid. <br />
<br />
Deprecated elements should be eliminated. <font>, and target are some examples.<br />
<br />
Tables shouldn't be used for layout- CSS is much easier, efficient, and accesible (if done right).<br />
<br />
Well, those are some starting pointers. Once you get these taken into account, valid pages wil be that much more within your grasp
<br /><br />
Make the changes according to what I've listed, and I bet you the vast majority of those errors will be gone.<!--content-->or maybe if I was lucky would do it for me. its not hard....
why would you want someone 2 do it 4 u?<!--content-->He's right, it isn't hard. It's actually easy... and you probably already know this, but i'd check <!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.subsilvernet.com%2F&charset=%28detect+automatically%29&doctype=XHTML+1.1&verbose=1">http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http% ... &verbose=1</a><!-- m --> for more specific instruction...<!--content-->yea!my sites valid....thanks...sorta?!<!--content-->Yeah, it is valid. That URL was to a validator page with a document ovverride in place, so it was saying "if it was XHTML 1.1, it'd be valid. So go to <!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.subsilvernet.com%2F&charset=%28detect+automatically%29&doctype=%28detect+automatically%29&verbose=1">http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http% ... &verbose=1</a><!-- m --> and you'll see it's valid See? 'Twas easy <!--content-->