I'm having a problem with Netscape 4.51.<br />
I use three frames on my website. The first one is 76 pixels in height. This looks good in netscape 6 and all IE browsers but it looks not good in netscape 4.51 (it looks too small here). If i want my site to look good in NN4.51 I have to make the frame 77 pixels instead of 76 pixels. But of course if i do that it doesn't look good anymore in IE (it's a pixel bigger).<br />
Does anyone know how to fix this?<br />
Here's my code.<br />
<br />
<br />
<frameset border="0" frameborder="no" frameborder="0" framespacing="0" rows="76,*,27"><br />
<frame name="ABVV_boven" noresize scrolling="no" src=http://www.htmlforums.com/archive/index.php/"activiteiten/boven.php"><br />
<frame name="ABVV_midden" noresize src=http://www.htmlforums.com/archive/index.php/"activiteiten/midden.php"><br />
<frame name="ABVV_onder" noresize scrolling="no" src=http://www.htmlforums.com/archive/index.php/"activiteiten/onder.php"><br />
</frameset><!--content-->Netscrap 4.x calculates frame borders different. If you have to support Netscrap 4, either live with the difference, or waste a lot of time making it look good in NS4, and then make adjsutments for modern browsers.<br />
<br />
<br />
OR..........<br />
<br />
Quit support relics.<!--content-->i don't like frames. people will get redirected to one of the frames from searchengines f. eks, and will end up not understanding ****, since they only see 1/3 of the page. but that is a strictly personal opinion. i know that sometimes frames are fitting, but i've just seen so many pages that will do better without...<!--content-->friday: one pixel makes it look bad?? better think of another way then.
<br />
<br />
Cobol: I understand with what you are saying and agree 100% but it is kind of hard when they still make. NS 4.8 was just released 2 weeks ago.<!--content-->any way that you could make the page with tables instead of frames?<!--content-->
I use three frames on my website. The first one is 76 pixels in height. This looks good in netscape 6 and all IE browsers but it looks not good in netscape 4.51 (it looks too small here). If i want my site to look good in NN4.51 I have to make the frame 77 pixels instead of 76 pixels. But of course if i do that it doesn't look good anymore in IE (it's a pixel bigger).<br />
Does anyone know how to fix this?<br />
Here's my code.<br />
<br />
<br />
<frameset border="0" frameborder="no" frameborder="0" framespacing="0" rows="76,*,27"><br />
<frame name="ABVV_boven" noresize scrolling="no" src=http://www.htmlforums.com/archive/index.php/"activiteiten/boven.php"><br />
<frame name="ABVV_midden" noresize src=http://www.htmlforums.com/archive/index.php/"activiteiten/midden.php"><br />
<frame name="ABVV_onder" noresize scrolling="no" src=http://www.htmlforums.com/archive/index.php/"activiteiten/onder.php"><br />
</frameset><!--content-->Netscrap 4.x calculates frame borders different. If you have to support Netscrap 4, either live with the difference, or waste a lot of time making it look good in NS4, and then make adjsutments for modern browsers.<br />
<br />
<br />
OR..........<br />
<br />
Quit support relics.<!--content-->i don't like frames. people will get redirected to one of the frames from searchengines f. eks, and will end up not understanding ****, since they only see 1/3 of the page. but that is a strictly personal opinion. i know that sometimes frames are fitting, but i've just seen so many pages that will do better without...<!--content-->friday: one pixel makes it look bad?? better think of another way then.
<br /><br />
Cobol: I understand with what you are saying and agree 100% but it is kind of hard when they still make. NS 4.8 was just released 2 weeks ago.<!--content-->any way that you could make the page with tables instead of frames?<!--content-->