When I validated my CSS by using W3C CSS Validator (<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator-uri.html">http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator-uri.html</a><!-- m -->), it gave me this:
Line : 7 font-family: You are encouraged to offer a generic family as a last alternative
Is it bad to use font-family???
JDMThanks for the clarifying that for me
JDMOriginally posted by JDM71488
Is it bad to use font-family???No, it's bad to use "font-family" without specifying "a generic family as a last alternative." See <!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS2/fonts.html#generic-font-families">http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS2/fonts.htm ... t-families</a><!-- m -->.
font-faimly: 'Century Gothic', Verdana, sans-serif
Line : 7 font-family: You are encouraged to offer a generic family as a last alternative
Is it bad to use font-family???
JDMThanks for the clarifying that for me
JDMOriginally posted by JDM71488
Is it bad to use font-family???No, it's bad to use "font-family" without specifying "a generic family as a last alternative." See <!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS2/fonts.html#generic-font-families">http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS2/fonts.htm ... t-families</a><!-- m -->.
font-faimly: 'Century Gothic', Verdana, sans-serif