Do you like?

liunx

Guest
Tell me how my website is!<br />
<br />
<!-- w --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.crosspoint.org">www.crosspoint.org</a><!-- w --><br />
<br />
Thanks.<br />
Jonathan<br />
<br />
Send any tips, or html stuff either here or to my aol screen name.<!--content-->Ah you have changed it since last time. I said it then i will say it now For a church site content is the most important part and I would not be too concernted with layout. But can you speed up your transitions a bit though because it takes too long to go to the next page with them at that speed.<!--content-->See previous thread linked below for what I listed as things to work on. I see you made a couple things better, but just about all of my issues from before remain. Also, your code is one big heap of a mess. khaki mentioned some of this and I even gave you a nice clean template to work with, but you ignored our advice and kept your code in the shape it was. If I were to try and code the site at this point I would scrap what you have and start over, or at least take the version I posted before and go from there. And yes, validate your pages. Even going against 4.01 Trans produced 49 errors. If you are wondering, click on the Doctype link in my sig and pick one of the Doctypes link in the article. Then go and use the link to W3C's validator and start to weed through your errors that way. If you have a question as to why something is an error, ask.<br />
<br />
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://forums.webdeveloper.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=10895">http://forums.webdeveloper.com/showthre ... adid=10895</a><!-- m --><!--content-->And aesthetically...<br />
<br />
As a bare minimum, you should reconsider your background color, and either stop using the custom cursor, or get one that doesn't have the "jaggies" around it. As I said, that is just the bare minimums...<!--content-->Thanks for hte suguestions, but I have only been doing html etc for about 4-6 months, (on and off, at school 8th grade) So i do need some clarification on the doctype stuff.. i will re-consider the background... I just have to be somewhere really quick. so I will do that later... maybe by tomorrow.<!--content-->The link to the Doctype article isn't working right now for me, but if you can read it then it should explain everything you need to know. The code I posted in the old thread has a Doctype already in there as an example of how you use it.<!--content-->
 
Back
Top