I quote:
"This xhtml document is marked up to provide the designer with the maximum possible flexibility.
There are more classes and extraneous tags than needed, and in a real world situation, it's more likely that it would be much leaner."
Is it such a problem that it contains more classes or tags than needed? It's true that it's slightly beefier, but not as much as if tables were used. Just trying to grasp ideas of the sorts. I just want to be prepared for any future project that I may be involved in.
In any case, I'm so freaked out by that site - it's incredible!I don't really see a problem with it being "beefy." The point of the site is that a well thought site out in terms of markup can have huge amounts of flexibility in terms of varying it's look and it makes the idea of redesigning a site seem that much easier. It's basically a promotional site for CSS.Originally posted by spufi
It's bassically a promotional site for CSS.
And a very good one at that.
"This xhtml document is marked up to provide the designer with the maximum possible flexibility.
There are more classes and extraneous tags than needed, and in a real world situation, it's more likely that it would be much leaner."
Is it such a problem that it contains more classes or tags than needed? It's true that it's slightly beefier, but not as much as if tables were used. Just trying to grasp ideas of the sorts. I just want to be prepared for any future project that I may be involved in.
In any case, I'm so freaked out by that site - it's incredible!I don't really see a problem with it being "beefy." The point of the site is that a well thought site out in terms of markup can have huge amounts of flexibility in terms of varying it's look and it makes the idea of redesigning a site seem that much easier. It's basically a promotional site for CSS.Originally posted by spufi
It's bassically a promotional site for CSS.
And a very good one at that.